The Food Crime Officers (Complaints and Misconduct) Regulations 2025
The Food Crime Officers (Complaints and Misconduct) Regulations 2025, effective May 1, 2025, establish a framework for handling complaints and misconduct involving Food Standards Agency food crime officers in England and Wales.
The regulations adapt the Police Reform Act 2002, outlining procedures for investigations, reporting to the Secretary of State, and payment arrangements.
They detail the roles of the Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC), the Food Standards Agency chief executive, and the Secretary of State, including responsibilities for investigations, referrals, and reporting.
The regulations also address issues like evidence preservation, timeliness of investigations, the role of an 'FSA friend,' and restrictions on disclosure of sensitive information, while incorporating mechanisms for review and appeal.
Arguments For
Intended benefits: The regulations aim to provide a clear and consistent framework for handling complaints and misconduct against food crime officers, ensuring accountability and maintaining public confidence.
Evidence cited: The regulations draw upon the existing Police Reform Act 2002 as a model, adapting it to the specific context of food crime officers. Consultation with relevant stakeholders, including the Independent Office for Police Conduct, is also mentioned.
Implementation methods: The regulations detail specific procedures for handling complaints, conducting investigations, and reporting findings to the Secretary of State.
Legal/historical basis: The regulations are based on the powers conferred by sections 26E(1), (2) and (6) and 105(4) and (5) of the Police Reform Act 2002 and section 63(3)(b) of the Police Act 1996.
Arguments Against
Potential impacts: The regulations may place additional burdens on the Food Standards Agency in terms of resources and administrative processes. There is a potential impact on the timeliness of investigations.
Implementation challenges: Effective implementation will require adequate training for food crime officers and staff involved in handling complaints and investigations. Collaboration between various agencies (police, National Crime Agency, FSA) might present coordination challenges.
Alternative approaches: Alternative mechanisms for handling complaints against food crime officers could be explored, potentially involving internal review processes or independent tribunals with specialized expertise.
Unintended effects: The regulations’ detailed procedures might lead to unnecessary bureaucracy or potentially inhibit prompt action in certain situations. The extensive reporting requirements could place an undue burden.
The Secretary of State makes the following Regulations in exercise of the powers conferred by sections 26E(1), (2) and (6) and 105(4) and (5) of the Police Reform Act 20021. In accordance with section 24 of that Act2, the Secretary of State has consulted with the Independent Office for Police Conduct3, the Director General, such persons as appear to the Secretary of State to represent the views of police and crime commissioners, the Mayor’s Office for Policing and Crime, the Common Council, the National Police Chiefs’ Council and such other persons as the Secretary of State thinks fit. In accordance with section 63(3)(b) of the Police Act 19964, the Secretary of State has supplied a draft of these Regulations to the Police Advisory Board for England and Wales and has taken into account its representations before making these Regulations.
The Secretary of State created these regulations using the authority granted by sections 26E and 105 of the Police Reform Act 2002.
Following section 24 of that Act, consultations were held with various bodies including the Independent Office for Police Conduct, police representatives, and others.
In compliance with section 63(3)(b) of the Police Act 1996, the draft was given to the Police Advisory Board for England and Wales, and their feedback was considered.
PART 1 Introductory
- Citation, commencement and extent (1) These Regulations may be cited as the Food Crime Officers (Complaints and Misconduct) Regulations 2025 and come into force on 1st May 2025. (2) These Regulations extend to England and Wales.
- Interpretation (1) In these Regulations— “2002 Act” means the Police Reform Act 2002; “chief executive” means the chief executive of the FSA; “chief officer” means the chief officer of police of any police force; “complainant” means— (a) in the case of a complaint falling within regulation 10(1)(d), the person on whose behalf the complaint was made; (b) in the case of a complaint not falling within regulation 10(1)(d), the person by whom the complaint was made; but where any person is acting on another’s behalf for the purposes of any complaint, anything that is to be, or that may be, done under these Regulations by, or in relation to, the complainant may be done by, or in relation to, the person acting on the complainant’s behalf; “complaint” has the meaning given by regulation 10(1) and includes a purported complaint; “conduct” includes acts, omissions, statements and decisions (whether actual, alleged or inferred) by an officer, whilst on duty, and acting or operating under powers in the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 or the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994 in their capacity as an officer; “conduct matter” has the meaning given by regulation 10(2)(a); “death or serious injury matter” and “DSI matter” have the meaning given by regulation 10(2)(b); “Director General” means the Director General of the Office; “disciplinary proceedings” means any proceedings or management process during which the conduct of an officer is considered in order to determine whether a sanction or punitive measure should be imposed against that person in relation to that conduct; “document” means anything in which information of any description is recorded; “FSA” means the Food Standards Agency; “FSA friend” means a person chosen under regulation 51(2); “information” includes estimates and projections, and statistical analyses; “information notice” has the meaning given in regulation 68(1); “interested person” means a person who has an interest in being kept properly informed about the handling of a complaint, conduct matter or DSI matter in accordance with regulation 60; “Office” means the Independent Office for Police Conduct; “officer” means, unless the context otherwise requires, a food crime officer, and for this purpose “food crime officer” has the meaning given in section 114C of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 2004; “person complained against”, in relation to a complaint, means the person whose conduct is the subject matter of the complaint; “person concerned” has the meaning given in regulation 49(9); “person investigating”, in relation to a complaint, recordable conduct matter or DSI matter, means the person appointed or designated to investigate that complaint or matter; “recordable conduct matter” means a conduct matter that is required to be recorded by the chief executive under regulation 18 or 19, or which has been so recorded; “relevant document” means a document relating to any complaint or matter under investigation (and includes a document containing suggestions as to lines of inquiry to be pursued or witnesses to be interviewed), but this definition does not apply in relation to regulation 72; “relevant offence” means— (a) an offence for which the sentence is fixed by law; or (b) an offence for which a person aged 18 years or over, who has not previously been convicted, may be sentenced to imprisonment for a term of seven years or more (or might be so sentenced but for the restrictions imposed by section 33 of the Magistrates’ Courts Act 1980); “relevant statement” means an oral or written statement relating to any complaint or matter under investigation; “serious injury” means a fracture, a deep cut, a deep laceration or an injury causing damage to an internal organ or the impairment of any bodily function; “severity assessment” means, in relation to conduct, an assessment as to— (a) whether the conduct, if proved, would amount to misconduct that is so serious as to justify disciplinary action or gross misconduct; and (b) if the conduct were to become the subject of disciplinary proceedings, the form which those proceedings would be likely to take. (2) References in these Regulations to a “member of the public”, in relation to any conduct or anything purporting to be a complaint about any conduct, do not include references to an officer. (3) For the purposes of these Regulations, a person is adversely affected if that person suffers any form of loss or damage, distress or inconvenience, if that person is put in danger or if that person is otherwise unduly put at risk of being adversely affected. (4) References in these Regulations to the investigation of any complaint or matter by the chief executive, under the direction of the Director General, or by the Director General are to be construed as references to the Director General’s investigation in accordance with— (a) regulation 42 (investigations by the chief executive on the chief executive’s own behalf); (b) regulation 43 (investigation by a police force or the National Crime Agency under the direction of the Director General); (c) regulation 44 (investigations directed by the Director General); or (d) regulation 45 (investigations by the Director General).
These regulations are titled the Food Crime Officers (Complaints and Misconduct) Regulations 2025 and came into effect on May 1, 2025, applying to England and Wales.
Key terms are defined, including the '2002 Act' (Police Reform Act 2002), 'chief executive' (Food Standards Agency's chief executive), and 'complainant' (the person making the complaint, with clarification for cases where someone acts on another's behalf).
Other definitions address 'complaint,' 'conduct,' 'conduct matter,' 'death or serious injury matter' (DSI matter), 'Director General' (IOPC's Director General), 'disciplinary proceedings,' 'document,' FSA, 'FSA friend,' 'information,' 'information notice,' 'interested person,' 'Office' (IOPC), 'officer' (Food Crime Officer), 'person complained against,' 'person concerned,' 'person investigating,' 'recordable conduct matter,' 'relevant document,' 'relevant offence,' 'relevant statement,' 'serious injury,' and 'severity assessment.' The regulations clarify that 'member of the public' excludes officers.
A person is considered 'adversely affected' if they experience loss, distress, danger, or undue risk.
References to investigations refer to those specified in regulations 42-45.