The Income and Corporation Taxes (Electronic Communications) (Amendment) Regulations 2025

The Income and Corporation Taxes (Electronic Communications) (Amendment) Regulations 2025, effective March 11, 2025, amend the 2003 Regulations.

Key changes include removing an outdated definition, broadening the regulations to encompass penalties under the Finance Act 2021, and adding new provisions specifying conditions for valid electronic information delivery.

These amendments aim to improve efficiency, clarify procedures, and modernize tax communication processes.

Arguments For

  • Improved efficiency and modernization: The amendments streamline the process of delivering tax information electronically, reducing administrative burden for both taxpayers and HMRC. This leverages technology to improve efficiency and reduce costs.

  • Clarity and consistency: The regulations provide greater clarity on the conditions for valid electronic delivery of tax information, reducing ambiguity and potential disputes.

  • Compliance with modern communication methods: The updated regulations adapt to current technology and communication practices, ensuring that HMRC can effectively manage tax communications in a digital age. This ensures compliance with modern communication standards.

  • Enhanced penalty enforcement: The amendments expand the scope of the 2003 Regulations to include penalties under the Finance Act 2021, improving enforcement and compliance with tax obligations.

Arguments Against

  • Potential for increased complexity: The amendments introduce new paragraphs and sub-paragraphs, potentially increasing the complexity of understanding relevant tax regulations.

  • Unforeseen technical challenges: The reliance on electronic communication could expose HMRC and taxpayers to technical issues or unforeseen system failures, leading to delays or errors in processing.

  • Digital divide concerns: The reliance on electronic communication may disadvantage taxpayers without reliable technology access, limiting their ability to fulfil their tax obligations.

  • Overregulation: Critics might argue the additional complexity related to conditions for satisfactory electronic delivery is unnecessarily burdensome and represents overregulation.

The Commissioners for His Majesty’s Revenue and Customs make the following Regulations in exercise of the powers conferred by section 132 of the Finance Act 19991, and now exercisable by them2, and section 135 of the Finance Act 20023.

These Regulations may be cited as the Income and Corporation Taxes (Electronic Communications) (Amendment) Regulations 2025 and come into force on 11th March 2025.

The Income and Corporation Taxes (Electronic Communications) Regulations 20034 are amended as follows.

In regulation 1 (citation, commencement and interpretation), omit paragraph (2B).

In regulation 2 (scope of these Regulations), in paragraph (1)(a)—

(a) after paragraph (x), omit “or”;

(b) after paragraph (xi), for “; and” substitute “ , or

(xii) paragraph 6, 8 or 16 of Schedule 24, or paragraph 12 or 13 of Schedule 25, or paragraph 7, 9, 16 or 17 of Schedule 26, to the Finance Act 20215, except in relation to value added tax;”.

In regulation 3 (use of electronic communications)—

(a) after paragraph (7), insert—

(7A) Paragraph (7B) applies where—

(a) a person other than the Board uses electronic communications to deliver information to the Board, in a case falling within paragraph (2) or (2A) (“the relevant paragraph”), and

(b) one or more of the conditions mentioned in the relevant paragraph is not satisfied.

(7B) The conditions mentioned in the relevant paragraph are nevertheless to be treated as satisfied—

(a) if the Board is satisfied that the situation mentioned in paragraph (7A)(b) is not so significant as to undermine the purpose of the relevant paragraph, namely the delivery by approved electronic means of information of the type with which the relevant paragraph is concerned, or

(b) if the person had to make the delivery by a certain time and the Board is satisfied that the situation mentioned in paragraph (7A)(b) is the result of the person’s reasonable attempt to make the delivery by that time or within any extra time allowed for the delivery.

(7C) In paragraph (7B)(b), “extra time” allowed for a delivery means any time, beyond that normally allowed for the delivery, in which the person making the delivery is allowed to do so—

(a) by the Board or an officer of the Board, where they have power to allow such time, or

(b) otherwise, by or under any enactment, and includes any time at which the person is treated, for the purposes of any enactment and by reason of having an excuse (however described) for not having made the delivery, as not having failed to make the delivery or as not being liable to the consequences of such a failure;

(b) omit paragraphs (8) and (9).

In regulation 5 (effect of delivering information by means of electronic communications), in paragraph (1), for the words after “satisfied”, where it first appears, substitute “or, in the case of the conditions mentioned in regulation 3(2) or (2A), are treated under regulation 3(7B) as being satisfied.”.

Penny Ciniewicz

Jonathan Athow

Two of the Commissioners for His Majesty's Revenue and Customs

14th February 2025